Healthbuzz

Obama Healthy but Struggles With Smoking

Doctors recommend that the president continue his “smoking cessation efforts” and that he change his diet to bring down a cholesterol level that is borderline high.

Hospitals and Doctors Drove Up California Health Costs

Dr. Quentin Young: Put Single Payer Back on the Table

One year after its much-ballyhooed launch, the Obama administration’s approach to health reform is now in serious disarray. The president’s health care summit on Feb. 25 is being portrayed as a last ditch bid to find some common ground with his “just say no” Republican opposition. He also faces an increasingly wary group of disgruntled Democrats, whose memory of the Massachusetts massacre — the election of a Republican to Sen. Edward Kennedy’s seat — remains fresh. The summit proceedings, which will be televised in the name of “transparency,” will no doubt be laden with a formidable amount of stagecraft. They will be preceded by the unveiling of the president’s own legislative proposal — presumably the odious Senate bill with some tweaks — a few days before. But it’s almost certain that this latest White House initiative, undertaken with the stated goal of salvaging and passing at least some elements of the stalled congressional bills, is foredoomed. The House bill, contrary to many who believe otherwise, is disastrous. And if such a thing is possible, its Senate counterpart is even worse. Both would shovel hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars into the coffers of the private health insurance industry. Both would make it a federal offense, with fines, for a person to fail to buy the insurers’ shoddy products. Even so, at least 23 million people would remain uninsured under the new law. And those who have insurance would remain vulnerable to extort premium increases, not unlike Anthem Blue Cross’ recently announced premium hikes of up to 39 percent in California. While one could imagine the enactment of certain piecemeal measures that might ameliorate our condition — e.g., a simple prohibition of insurance company denials of coverage because of pre-existing conditions — these are precisely the stand-alone measures most stubbornly opposed by Republicans, conservative Democrats and their corporate patrons. Such concessions, in their eyes, must be linked to shoring up the very culprits who are most responsible for our health care mess. The presence of the for-profit health industry — the private health insurance conglomerate and the Big Pharma drug companies in the first place — in the legislative process has certainly been “transparent” from the get go. Through their lobbyists and campaign contributions , they shaped a bill that would enhance their domination of our health system. They are at the root of the catastrophe that passes for health care financing in the United States today. Of course, the conspicuous omission in the debate has been single-payer national health insurance proposal , an improved Medicare for All. This was assured on the Senate side when the powerful chairman of its Finance Committee, Max Baucus, D-Mont., informed the world that everything was on the table but single payer. How the chairman of a congressional committee, however powerful, can set the terms of debate in a democratic society by excluding such a popular and well-substantiated solution is hard to rationalize. Baucus did, of course, prevail, and what came out of the Senate was execrable. Like the House bill, it fails the three tests of genuine reform: universal coverage, quality improvement and cost control. One can reasonably suspect that President Obama now wants something — anything — to pass in Congress as evidence of the fulfillment of his campaign pledge to accomplish health care reform. But if he looks to the House and Senate bills as the starting point, his efforts will be in vain. It’s not too late for the president to re-embrace his earlier support for single-payer national health insurance and set the nation on the right path. Were he to lay out the facts to the American people and provide energetic leadership for this eminently rational proposal, he would get strong, grassroots support from the public. We’re now spending $8,000 per capita annually on health care, $2.5 trillion in total. That’s nearly one-fifth of our GDP . Yet our health outcomes rank among the lowest in the industrialized world. Some 45,000 people die each year chiefly because they have no health insurance , and medical bills and illness are now linked to nearly two-thirds of personal bankruptcies . This reality in the richest country in the world is unnecessary and intolerable. I suggest the president look to an improved and expanded Medicare program as the solution. Medicare, which was enacted in 1965 and which has served our elderly and the totally disabled so well, is a solid foundation to build upon. Enactment of an improved Medicare for All would save our nation $400 billion annually by eliminating the bureaucracy and paperwork inflicted on our system by the private insurers. That’s more than enough to provide universal, comprehensive care to everyone and to eliminate all co-pays and deductibles. A single-payer system would also allow us to rein in costs and better allocate resources. We have a talented health care workforce. But to fully unlock their potential, we need to get out from under the greedy dictates of the health industry. Mr. President, it’s time to put single payer back on the table. Read more: Health Care Reform , White House’s Health Care Summit , Health Care , Politics News

Big-Employer Health Care Costs Rise 6.5 Percent In 2010: Study

INDIANAPOLIS — A new study says health care costs for large employers will rise more than 6 percent this year, and more companies are thinking about revamping their benefits. The study from benefits consultant Towers Watson says this year’s increase in the cost companies pay to administer health plans and pay claims is down slightly from 2009′s 7 percent hike. Read more: Towers Watson , Health Care Costs , Health Care Coverage , Health Benefits , Benefits , Employers , Economy , Health Care , Business News

Tamara McClintock Greenberg: Can Overweight Women Trust Their Doctors?

Being a doctor these days is hard. But so is being a patient, especially if you happen to be female and overweight. A study last year found that more than 40% of doctors feel “frustrated” by obese patients. But feelings among doctors are not the only problem. Recent studies have found that a woman who is as little as 13 pounds overweight may receive less than optimal medical care. Women who are over 20 pounds on the wrong side of the scale are more prone to inaccurate diagnoses, have more trouble finding a fertility doctor for help with getting pregnant, and are less likely to receive early diagnosis and effective treatment for cancer. The research matches up quite accurately with my clinical experience. Over the years I have known many overweight women who have been misdiagnosed by their physicians. And though I realize that anyone can be misdiagnosed, the striking numbers of overweight women whose doctors have missed serious illness reinforces the belief that doctors think differently about those carrying extra pounds. Of course obesity is a serious problem and one that should be addressed. But weight gain is partially related to self-control, as well as genetic and biological factors. Many physicians, whom we often expect should know better, attribute being overweight solely to dietary habits. This is in spite of data on biological factors that are implicit in weight gain. Psychotropic drugs , which are taken by millions, cause people to put on pounds. Ironically, these medications are often prescribed by the very same doctors that are annoyed with their patients for being heavier than they should be. Additionally, though in need of further study, some have speculated on chemical and environmental factors that impact metabolism via hormone production. There is even speculation that environmental toxins are associated with the development of diabetes in some populations. That being said, some people simply do eat too much. And they can learn to change this behavior. But where are realistic discussions about today’s overwhelming guidelines about what is required of all of us to stay healthy? At last count, recommendations for crucial self-care behaviors for reducing heart disease, cancer and dementia include the following: manage weight, get plenty of exercise, avoid high fat and high cholesterol foods, eat several vegetables and fruits a day, floss at least once a day, get regular teeth cleaning, reduce meat consumption, don’t smoke, avoid sugar and other simple carbohydrates, and take medications strictly as prescribed. And then there are the more confusing recommendations– vitamin D intake (which experts don’t agree on), drinking alcohol (the amounts vary depending on the kind of disease you are trying to avoid) and eating a lot of fish (but not too much, because of mercury). And regarding mercury, how do we manage this potentially dangerous metal? Should we all rush to get our fillings replaced? And in this economy, who can afford it? As if that list weren’t comprehensive enough, for those of us especially worried about both the environment and our health, we are told that we should avoid foods with preservatives, eat organic, and ingest meat that is responsibly raised and without hormones. Though I personally agree with many health recommendations, this dizzying list of behaviors is quite frankly out of reach for most people. Work commitments, time and finances limit many from achieving these ideals. Doctors know this. Many physicians have trouble doing all that is needed to take care of themselves. Presumably, like the rest of us, they are too busy or too confused to follow the guidelines. But still, why do some doctors give up on patients who have trouble controlling their weight, especially if they happen to be women? Since doctors are human, they are subject to the same biases many of us share. And with almost half of medical patients in the U.S. being noncompliant with medical advice, doctors are understandably frustrated. Why this gets taken out on women, however, remains curious. We can look at our fascination with women in the popular media as a guide. Dramatic weight loss post-pregnancy is a major source of hits on websites that profile the famous. And let’s face it, we expect our women role models to be thin, despite how busy they might be trying to raise a family or deal with post-partum hormones and mood. Maybe if things were more balanced on the gender scale for us in society, then doctors would follow. Although medical clinicians are an easy target of our derision, holding them to a higher standard is not working, at least for overweight women who need care. While doctors certainly need to come to terms with their biases, the rest of us need to come to terms with our own. We should stop holding women to higher standards in terms of weight and beauty. Let’s talk about how healthcare guidelines are useful, but more realistic for people who have the time and money to follow them. Read more: Women , Aging , Physicians , Nutrition Guidelines , Obesity , Diet , Healthcare , Women's Health , Doctors , Health Care , Living News

Abdulrahman El-Sayed: Failing the Test: Did Our Discomfort With Numbers Doom Health Reform?

Academic physicians interested in analyzing medical decisions among patients have increasingly turned their attention toward “numeracy,” or facility and ease with numbers, as a predictor of medical decision-making. That literature, unsurprisingly, has shown that patients who are less numerate make poorer decisions about their health. Findings from a study published in the peer-reviewed journal Medical Decision Making in 2001 summarize this phenomenon well: the authors showed that numeracy was an important predictor of how subjects valued their current health. In fact, those with the lowest numeracy scores actually valued worse health over better health! Among the more well-known, disheartening trends in American society are stagnant math and science scores relative to our international counterparts. Increasingly, young Americans are balking at the numerical disciplines, leaving them to more motivated and increasingly better-trained internationals. Every four years, the International Center for Education Statistics produces the “Trends in International Math and Sciences Study” (TIMSS) , which evaluates math and science aptitude among American 4th and 8th graders relative to their peers internationally. The most recent TIMMS report reflects data from 2007. The findings showed that compared to the first study in 1995, scores in science and math have stagnated among US students, as compared to stark improvements in several other countries (including Iran). While the implications of our national falling-out with numbers on the strength of our technical workforce are obvious, the policy implications of this trend may be more insidious. Let’s turn our attention healthcare reform, considering that we’re now mourning “what could have been” after watching the saga of its troubling life, from its infancy as a campaign promise, to its childhood as a mandate following Pres. Obama’s victory, to its chaotic adolescence under the influences of populism in town-hall meetings this past summer, and finally to the fateful near-death accident that’s left it teetering on the edge. A central conundrum many on the left have struggled with, is that the demographic most likely to oppose healthcare reform seems to be the same demographic most likely to benefit from it. If numeracy is a key predictor of the ability to value health among a small sample of Americans, did poor American numeracy doom healthcare reform? After all, the reform package was built around two empiric arguments that would address crucial policy imperatives, the economic imperative to lower healthcare costs, and the moral imperative to improve health coverage. Reform would reel in healthcare costs as a proportion of GDP from the current 16% (estimated to be 37% by 2050 at current rates), and it would expand coverage to between 31 and 36 million Americans, decreasing the proportion of America’s uninsured by up to 78%. Clearly, both of these arguments are quantitatively complex, and therefore, implicitly dependent on the American public’s ability to understand and evaluate percentages, proportions, ratios, and returns. Both ultimately failed. As American math and science skills continue to stagnate, the outlook for appropriate, yet empirically complicated social policy looks bleak. While healthcare reform may be the first on Obama’s ambitious list of policy targets that has suffered as a consequence of poor numeracy among the American populous, it won’t likely be the last. Climate change poses another scientifically and mathematically challenging series of trade-offs that are poorly understood and perceived skeptically by many Americans. Forthcoming climate change legislation may suffer the same troubled and tragically short life as its older brother. With this understanding, even in light of pressing concerns over poor health outcomes and rising healthcare costs, a quickly deteriorating environment, belligerent banks, and a plethora of other urgent policy foci, equitable access to high quality education, especially in the sciences and math, may be the most important policy focus of them all. Frankly, if a group of subjects with poor quantitative skills don’t have the ability to value better health over worse health in a simulation, we can’t expect an increasingly less numerate population to make sound decisions about our national health, our economy, or our shared Earth. In a democracy “for the people, and by the people”, it is crucial that “the people” can understand the theoretical underpinnings, complex trade-offs, and difficult decisions that frame our social policy. Read more: Education , Education Policy , Health Care Reform , Innumeracy , Climate Change , Policy , Health Care , Obama Health Care , Science Education , Healthcare , Politics News

Sahar Sepehri: President Obama, Please Hurry Up

Today President Obama unveiled new healthcare plans, but he will be talking about the details in a couple of days. This proposal supposed to help more than thirty million Americans who need healthcare to survive in the US. Healthcare, one of the President’s major presidential component and his pride has been facing challenges ever since first proposed. One of the major obstacles was losing a senate seat to Scott Brown, Massachusetts’ Republican Senator. Other challenges are how to convince a capitalist mentality, which has been practiced in the US for decades. Such issues and not moving forward faster than expected with the President’s plan has made many, including my family–especially my mother–extremely impatient. My mother suffers from variety of serious medical problems, and she has not had medical insurance in the past a couple of months. Sarcoidosis, heart disease, and two miner strokes are just the important ones. She also has high blood pressure and cholesterol. Not to forget, my mother is on heavy duty medications such as Methotrexate (a kind of chemotherapy medication) and cortisone to control the Sarcoidosis. These medications generate their own complications. She has lost some of her hair. She is constantly tired. Her face has puffed up to a “moon face,” and her back has hunched to a “buffalo hump.” These are medical terms used by her doctors. One of the strokes has made her very forgetful. So, she is practically and officially disabled. A disabled woman without health coverage, can you imagine? She has applied for Medicate, but the process has taken forever. Private insurance is simply not an option because of her medical complications and high price. So we have to wait. My mother is strong emotionally. She has always been a survivor, not knowing any better ever since she was a child. An untreated strep throat back in Iran haunted her up until now at the age of 60. I’m sure she won’t like it knowing I revealed one of her secrets. The strep throat damaged her heart which she had not been aware of until I was born. I am the last child of three. None of us, my sibling and I, could do much to prevent her illnesses from growing. My father passed away five years ago, and my sister lives in England. My brother helps her financially, paying the mortgage and for appliances. They live together. I am more like a moral support. I take her out to shop, talk to her on the phone every day, and watch a movie or two when I go visit her at her place. We are very close. However, not having medical insurance in America makes all of us live with constant anxiety and paranoia. Every time my phone rings, and it is my mother, my heart skips a beat. “I’m fine, don’t worry so much,” she tells me every time I pick up the phone. “You tell me if you don’t have any of your medication or you need to see a doctor right?” It’s my job to remind her all the time; otherwise she won’t say anything, thinking she will be a burden. Recently, we paid more than two thousand dollars for her medication, blood test, a cardiogram, and doctor visits. This is nothing. God forbid, if she needs emergency care, then we have to declare bankruptcy. The question is how many other Americans may have to face this? Today, based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Census Bureau in America, one out of six Americans doesn’t have health insurance. This is a real social catastrophe in the first world power. Last year, I followed President Obama’s healthcare plan very carefully, but to be honest, I never thought this problem would knock on my door. I have always been a supporter of President Obama’s health plan, and I still am if not more so. America as a great power needs to have a stronger healthcare in which everyone will benefit from. It is one of the rarest developed countries, if not the only one, in which its people suffer from unaffordable medical bills. And now, with the rate of unemployment remaining unchanged at 10% percent since last year, people face a swamp of financial debt more than ever. We, as a family, could also fall into that swamp any moment. It could happen to you too. The day my mother calls for medical assistance is getting closer and closer. I feel it. What if she will never get the damn Medicate? Anxiety paralyzes me. I will try, though, to keep a calm face not, and to make anyone else worried. When that day comes, I see myself calling my siblings to ask them to do their best to keep our mother alive. So, before that day arrives, I am asking President Obama to please hurry up. Read more: Sahar Sepehri , Healthcare , Personal Essay , Politics News

Qanta Ahmed, MD: Movement As Medicine: Spinning And The Self-Care Movement

I recently wrote about the paradigm-shifting experience of exercise when I stumbled upon SoulCycle. I read about it when Chelsea Clinton held a Haiti fund-raising event there. I thought two things: wow, Chelsea has time to exercise? And cool, what is this exercise Chelsea does? I had to know and my discoveries are shared on HuffPost. If you haven’t already, run, I tell you, run into your nearest SoulCycle and find out what its all about. A novel and engaging form of spinning, SoulCycle engages body and brain in intense sessions which crest and soar on euphoria, guided imagery, candlelight and the unending surprise of discovering one’s inner strength. Lately, all this cycling has started the cogwheels in my brain spinning. Quite literally, all this movement (internal and external) has got me thinking about motion. Movement is medicine. And my spinning class certainly captures that, whether intentionally or not. A few days after my first class, I thought about the when I see my first patient one morning, an attractive 50-something year old who is planning gastric bypass surgery. She has been referred to me to evaluate for the presence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome that affects nine out of 10 people going for weight reduction surgery. Finding the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, and treating it before, during and after surgery significantly improves cardiac and lung complications related to the surgery. It’s important therefore to identify patients before surgery. I enter the room and I am about to tell her all this and much more when I see fat, ripe tears filling her eyes. Before I can even greet my patient, she is crying. I give her time to weep. After a few moments, she begins to speak. “My daughter is getting married in the summer. I have to look good for that. I can’t look like this” and she sweeps her hand in contempt towards her body. She looked at me, and promptly started crying again. “Oh, I used to look like you,” she continued, “and wear exactly the same kind of outfits. I’ll bring you a photo of how I used to look.” She cried some more. I felt vaguely guilty. Something about my appearance that day had triggered a memory of her lost self, a memory she clearly grieved. As we talked, I learned about her direct experience of 9-11 and how terrifying that had been for her. She then described the ‘August Blackout” some years later, when she found herself stranded in Manhattan unable to get home because of train outages and massive, citywide power loss. She described how she spent the night curbside without shelter, in limbo, until power had been restored. Eventually, feeling chronically unsafe, insecure, and vulnerable, she abandoned a job she loved in the City which had been her longstanding passion and moved permanently to the suburbs. Clearly, this was a loss she was still dealing with. She went from a dynamic, brisk lifestyle in the pulsing city to feeling confined and paralyzed, not only literally in the realm of her new work away from New York, but also in the figurative sense. As a result of her fears, her life and world had become much smaller. Unsurprisingly, her fears, her worries had paralyzed her. There was no movement in her life. Food quickly became a self-medication — fear a source of suffocation. The weight gain eventually devoured her old self. Now she was pinning all her hopes on this surgery. Certainly, bariatric surgery, as we term it, can be highly effective for reducing weight and reducing it abruptly. Certified centers of excellence, like the one where I work (at Winthrop University Hospital) combine a high degree of surgical expertise with an extensive medical, psychological and behavioral approach, ensuring the impacts are lasting. Many patients are greatly helped by such programs. We talked about what she had tried in terms of weight loss and the patient recounted many of the mainstream popular approaches of behavioral weight loss that we can all name without thinking. I looked at my patient and wondered what she could accomplish if only she had access to the magic captured in the SoulCycle philosophy. If only her efforts could have been supported with the intangible benefits of visualization, guided imagery and plain old fashioned psychotherapy, perhaps she would have what she needed to move through this difficult part of her life: hope and encouragement, and above all, movement. Movement is medicine. We have known that for a long time. So why then does American medicine espouse movement so poorly? We have created a surgical solution for disease which is fundamentally driven by the lack of movement in our lives, whether literal, or emotional, or oftentimes both. It really gave me pause. I have been treating patients for almost 20 years, talking to patients for 25, yet I know so little about the role of movement in health, and the way to help patients who are paralyzed by fear, difficulty, obstacles, or simply the grisly, arduous experience that is life. I talk to her about strategies for exercise, ways to weave it into a busy, challenging life. The day of her consultation with me, the patient is convinced nothing can help her the way surgery can — she has her heart set on a particular dress for the wedding and must ‘reach goal’ by then. Inside, I know she is correct. With the tools she has at her disposal, only ‘banding’ the stomach — making it abnormally small — will be the single most effective tool of managing her behavior and changing her eating in the short term. She has nothing else available to her. How sad. She had no confidence in other impacts on her behavior or her own ability to influence her own behavior. She had learned to believe she was not in control of her behavior. In her mind, only a surgeon could help. I believe classes like SoulCycle can change that. The words I heard in my first class, ‘you are stronger than you think” keep revolving in my brain like the spokes on spinning wheels. These words which I first heard my instructor Christine D’Ercole say have generated a whirring, whooshing background against which I am building a new landscape. What if Christine was right? What if this was actually true? What if I am literally stronger than I imagine? What if my patient could feel the same? When I think about this possibility, I discover my patient’s doctor is not too different than the patient herself. Like my patient struggling to ready herself for her daughter’s wedding, I also face challenges in the face of which I feel incapable — attainments toward which I am mysteriously barred, beliefs that I have been simply not strong enough to change. What if I removed these self-imposed barriers, and opened the gate to the rolling vista of possibility which lies before all of us through the empowerment of movement? This is one of the many reasons I have been wondering why can I not scribble exercise, including — for those who are healthy enough to safely tolerate it — spinning, on my prescription pad? Why is such exercise uncovered by most plans? It’s not just the 550 – 650 calories an hour one burns in these workouts that brings health. It’s impact is much more profound. Empowered movement, moving in a group, working out in a pack, can demolish the false ideas and confined measures of our own capabilities that we unhealthily hoard. Within the arrested time of a spinning class which successfully engages both mind and body we discover new inner realities. That’s where its powerful medicine lies. In sum, why is ‘modern’ medicine still so one-dimensional, so very not 21st Century? Why do insurance companies refuse coverage for what is fundamentally healing: medicine through movement and instead opt to cover what are largely intensely invasive, organ-specific interventional approaches? The answer is we as physicians haven’t educated ourselves or third-party payors to the contrary. Instead, we remain married to archaic, traditional philosophies even if our medical technology has exceeded the age of Avatar. In our practice, we remain disease-centered at a time when we need to move to being truly patient-centered. Why have we placed no value on being patient-centered in our current system, instead, choosing to accept the inordinate costs of invasive, highly aggressive organ-specific approaches removed from the patient’s actual life and function in society? These questions will remain unanswered until we, as Americans, demand answers. We are living through the tumultuous birth of HealthCare reform and what a pained, bloody process this delivery is emerging to be. I guess it’s a big baby and right now we are stuck in an intractable labor which threatens to turn into a ‘failure to progress.’ While we await the new arrival, here’s a new thought: agreed, as a nation we most certainly need intelligent HealthCare and Health Insurance reform, but what we are in just as much need of is SelfCare Reform. Americans have long abrogated their personal responsibility and, even more profoundly, their belief in being able to care for their own health and well-being . I am not referring to valuable and important screening for a malignancy, or careful measuring and monitoring of hemoglobin AIC, or a blood test for hepatitis or HIV. These are all important components to maintaining health and detecting disease. No. I am speaking to the belief that we have the ability to make ourselves, our families, and ultimately our entire lives healthier. Until we realize our abilities to engage in Self Care, and call for SelfCare Reform , we will remain static, passive, disengaged, as patients and physicians. When we do place a value on SelfCare ourselves, the market will too. Until then, I will not be able to write scripts for SoulCycle or indeed any other health-promoting self-driven patient behavior or intervention. Instead of paying physicians for performance of our procedures, at the present time we can only dream of paying physicians for enhancing our patient’s abilities to perform for themselves. What we need is not disease-centered health care, we need wellness-centered, patient-centered health care, namely SelfCare-centered healthcare . Wellness, nutrition and fitness is already a multi-billion-dollar industry. It’s time we turned these elements into a movement for medicine, and make our nation, our world, our lives healthier, more confident and more within our own control. Its time for SelfCare Reform, and my local SoulCycle on East 83rd may be just the first in many imaginative vehicles to carry us there, to carry us to a new kind of HealthCare – the SelfCare kind. How are you getting there? Read more: Selfcare Reform , Winthrop University Hospital , Chelsea Clinton , Selfcare , 9/11 , Bariatric Surgery , Health Insurance , Obesity , Guided Imagery , Christine D'Ercole , Soulcycle , Obstructive Sleep Apnea , Exercise , Gastric-Bypass , Weight Loss , Healthcare Reform , Spinning , Huffington Post , Medicine , Living News

President Obama: Waking the Debate Around Health Care

Californians face a 25-39% increase on health insurance premiums and several state governors plan Medicaid cuts.

Obama Readies Health Overhaul Proposal Ahead Of Summit

Are we the only ones wondering what took the Obama administration so long to lay out its own blueprint for a health overhaul bill?

Obama Makes Health Care Push At Nevada Town Hall

HENDERSON, Nev. — Days before hosting an intensive health care summit with both Republicans and Democrats, President Barack Obama made a fervent push for his overhaul, calling it critical not just for the millions without insurance but for the entire country’s economic well-being. “It is vital for our economy to change how health care works [...]

Feinstein Seeks To Block Insurance Rate Increases Across The Nation

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Friday that she plans to introduce legislation that would bar insurance companies from enacting health insurance premium rate increases that the Secretary of the Health and Human Services deems to be unjustified.

Public Option Activists Launch ‘Cascade’ Campaign, Polling Effort

Activists hoping to keep up momentum for the late stage push for a public option for insurance coverage are commissioning a set of polls in strategic states to show the level of support for passing the provision through a congressional process known as budget reconciliation.

Medicare Premium Increase: Private Plans Jump 14% In 2010

WASHINGTON — Millions of seniors who signed up for popular private health plans through Medicare are facing sharp premium increases this year – another sign that spiraling costs are a problem even for those with solid insurance. A study released Friday by a major consulting firm found that premiums for Medicare Advantage plans offering medical [...]

WellPoint Goes On Offense To Defend Insurance Rates

Giant health insurer WellPoint is putting up its dukes up in defense of higher premiums at its California subsidiary, Anthem Blue Cross.